Lessons on Local Government
July 17th, 2008I grew up on Onondaga County, where each town has a supervisor and there is also a County Legislature with an elected County Executive. When I moved to this area, the idea of a Board of Supervisors with a county administrator was quite alien to me, and it took me a little while and a bit of research to understand how the Ontario County system works. Before I started at FLCC, an experienced community college president gave me just one piece of advice - he said to attend all of the meetings of the Board of Supervisors and get to know how they work. So, when I arrived last summer I took his advice and I’ve now been observing our supervisors in action for nearly a year. After a while of having me join them at their meetings, they asked if I’d like to be put on the agenda, so now I update them briefly about the college at most of their meetings. My work with the supervisors has turned out to be one of the most unexpectedly fascinating aspects of being president of FLCC. It has truly been a lesson on how local government works.
Ontario County has a reputation for fiscal responsibility, and it is well deserved. I have been impressed by the care that goes into all decisions, but especially those with financial implications. While a casual observer at Board of Supervisor meetings might be surprised that often resolutions are passed with little discussion, that does not mean that decisions are made without careful consideration. The committee structure is very strong and each resolution is carefully vetted in committee before it moves to the full Board. Typically when there is considerable discussion at the full meeting, it is because the committee vote was not unanimous and committee members believe it’s important for the pros and cons to be discussed by the full group.
The major college-county initiative this year has been related to FLCC’s Facilities Master Plan. The plan was completed by an architectural firm in the fall of 2007, and offers a roadmap for future facility needs at the college. The Board of Supervisors approved the plan in concept in January, and it was sent off to SUNY on schedule to be included in the state budget. While the state worked on a SUNY-wide capital budget (changing the rules several times along the way), our FLCC Projects Committee and college staff worked through the plan in a methodical way.
Projects were combined for efficiency and prioritized. Issues related to routine maintenance of a building that is more than thirty-five years old were included in the conversations. Concerns about the learning environment - the heart of what we do - centered around upgrading classroom and lab facilities, addressing technology needs and building more general purpose classrooms. The analysis of campus centers was discussed at length, including the results of a feasibility study that strongly urged the college to build a third center in Victor. Our lease in Geneva will expire in a couple of years, and the committee talked through the implications of finding a permanent home for the college in Geneva. Also in the mix was discussion of facility needs for growing programs, our plans to move to a more efficient one-stop enrollment services center, Phase II of student housing and addressing the changing needs of a college that will have 600 resident students in 2009, safety concerns with the campus ring road and issues with the “temporary” trailer space that currently houses eleven classrooms at our main campus in Hopewell.
After many months of consideration, the Projects Committee considered the college’s strategic plan and worked with college staff to prioritize the significant pressing needs at FLCC. Preliminary drawings and cost estimates were reviewed by the committee in great detail and eventually nearly $10 million was eliminated from Phase I of the project.
The theme throughout our discussions with the county was that the college needed to identify a comprehensive plan so the county could consider the big picture and plan ahead. There are a number of costly county capital projects on the horizon, many of which were mandated by the state. My most fascinating lesson in local government actually came from watching the work of the Financial Management Committee. The Public Works Committee and the FLCC Projects Committee had carefully vetted requests for capital projects county-wide, and it was up to the Financial Management Committee to determine how to pay for them. Along with county administrators, this group worked with a spreadsheet that laid out all of the county’s capital projects and the funding requirements. They determined several possible scenarios to cover the annual cost, including the impact on the property tax rate, cutting county operations or increasing the sales tax. The discussions at this committee centered on how to move the county foreward by addressing critical needs with the least possible financial impact on the taxpayers of Ontario County. Over the spring months, a plan began to take shape.
It is in this context that the supervisors considered a resolution last week to raise the sales tax in Ontario County from 7-1/8 percent to 7-1/2 percent. This carefully crafted plan addresses in a comprehensive way the long-range facilities needs of the county and the college, and taxpayers will see the positive impact of these funds on a variety of fronts. The supervisors knew that it was very important to move forward, even in challenging financial times, because the facility issues will not go away and over time they will clearly grow in expense to the taxpayers. As a group, they expressed serious concerns with any additional property taxes. The small increase in the sales tax offers a couple of significant advantages as a source of funding: our sales tax will remain at least .5% lower than all surrounding counties and a considerable amount of our sales tax revenue is paid by people who live outside of Ontario County. As part of the plan, they are also lowering the county tax on home heating fuel, which is welcome in these times and has a positive impact on homeowners in our county.
After the vote last week, a number of reporters asked me to comment on the increase in sales tax. I am very grateful to the supervisors for their recognition of the importance of facility upgrades to the future of FLCC, of course. Still, I think watching the careful and thoughtful process that led to the point when they were ready to take the vote was a lesson for me in local government. This decision was not made quickly and the supervisors took into consideration a wide range of factors before deciding to move forward. Projects were reviewed in careful detail and cuts were made to ensure that the final comprehensive plan - both county and college projects - only included real needs. There are quite a few more decisions ahead, and I have no doubt that the supervisors will scrutinize each element of each project before voting to move forward. That is their job. After working closely with them this year, though, I have confidence that they truly care about the future of FLCC and share our vision of a college of choice - central to the cultural and economic vitality of the region. It will take a partnership between the college and the county for us to achieve that vision.